OnTrack Diabetes




    OnTrack is now part of Medivo! OnTrack allows you to quickly and easily keep track of everything you need to manage your diabetes.

    Features include:

    - Quickly and easily track blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, food, weight and many others
    - Ability to add/edit categories to suit your needs
    Generate detailed graphs and reports to share with your physician
    - Supports both US and International units for glucose and hemoglobin A1c
    - Easily keep track of your daily, weekly and monthly average glucose levels
    - Set reminders to keep you on track

    We’ve made a few exciting updates and look forward to making more in the future that will improve your experience with the app. We’d love to hear your feedback – you can reach us anytime at

    Tags: ontrack diabetes , ontrack diabetes software , ontrack , diabetes , ontrack diabetes for pc , on track diabetes , diabetes ontrack , diabetes software , ontrack diabetes restore

    Explore more

    Users review

    from 6.069 reviews



    Users comments for OnTrack Diabetes

    Mike Johnston

    by Mike Johnston

    Nov 16, 2017  |  "Poor"

    I used this app for a very long time; loved it. Stopped tracking my blood sugar for a bit and wanted to resume, but then I read the recent reviews. Sounds like somebody tried to fix something that wasn't broken.

    A Google user

    by A Google user

    Nov 12, 2017  |  "Awesome"


    A Google user

    by A Google user

    Nov 11, 2017  |  "Poor"

    Update sucks, cant track A1C deleting this app have used it for 5 years, sad loosing my data ticks me OFF

    Michael Beschler

    by Michael Beschler

    Nov 11, 2017  |  "Poor"

    Sadly, if I could give 0 stars I would. Deleting now.

    Yogesh Kumar

    by Yogesh Kumar

    Nov 09, 2017  |  "Good"


    Rick Duff

    by Rick Duff

    Oct 24, 2017  |  "Good"

    The previous version was much better. I have emailed support twice about the problems with it not computing daily averages (not reading day and time correctly) right and received no response. The problem appears to be getting worse, not better. Now I am concerned about how accurate it will be when with the rest of the calculations.